What a Hypocritical moron!
|
Gold Member Username: Thx_3417Bournemouth ... Post Number: 4411 Registered: May-05 | Read what this Hippocratic says second page down! What a lying sack of sh!t! http://forums.soundandvisionmag.com/audiovideo/board/message?board.id=29&thread.id=76620 I've been using matching fronts for 17 years! This fibbing piece of sh!t has got mismatched fronts if I remember! http://community.webshots.com/user/matthewbryans This person needs glasses he obviously can't see! A blind man would be able to tell the difference from the three. I can't read anymore more of this bullsh!t!  |
|
Gold Member Username: The_image_dynamicSan Diego Post Number: 2669 Registered: Dec-06 | LOL Cocoon. The golden rule concerning "matching" your fronts is two things: 1. Efficiency within two or three db. 2. Timbre matching between the mids and tweeters, and to a much smaller degree, the ouput of the bass drivers. Looks to me he has these two things nailed since those are from the same JBL S-series HT components and they use the exact same midrange and dome tweeters. The first requirement can be easily rectified with todays highly configurable surround-sound receivers and their multi-channel gain settings. The second requirement can also be rectified with a few adjustments to the eq controls to slightly boost the smaller woofers and slightly cut the larger woofers to create a stable and convincing soundstage. While I don't like his placement of either of the three speakers, his setup can be considered for all intents and purposes, "matched". |