Dish Network v. Bagdasaryan (aka Blacklist) update

 

Platinum Member
Username: Lklives

Post Number: 16146
Registered: Jan-06
http://www.ftabins.net/showthread.php?t=138573

Update...02/10/2010

Trial Date of 9/27/2010 proposed

Filed: 02/05/2010 - Entered: 02/10/2010


Case No. 2:09-cv-03351-RBL
Date 2/5/10
Title Dish Network v. Bagdasaryan
Conference Call re: Scheduling (Refer to attachment 03119609316.pdf )
Counsel advise that the criminal investigation in still on-going.

Counsel have adhered to the proposed deadlines submitted in the Joint Status Report [dkt #16. (Refer to attachment 03118729847-Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan-docket.16.pdf)

Trial Date of 9/27/2010 proposed; Clerk to confirm the availability of the courtroom. Counsel advise this trial should last 4 days (jury)

Court advises Counsel to call the Judicial Asst or Courtroom Deputy to schedule a conference call with regard to discovery disputes. Depending upon the complexity of the discovery issue, the court may request briefing.

Clerk will generate a trial schedule.



Dish Network L.L.C. et al v. Khachik Bagdasaryan

Plaintiffs: Dish Network L.L.C., Echostar Technologies, L.L.C. and Nagrastar L.L.C.
Defendants: Khachik Bagdasaryan

Case Number: 2:2009cv03351
Filed: May 12, 2009

Court: California Central District Court
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: XX US, Outside California
Presiding Judge: Gutierrez
Presiding Judge: Larson
Referring Judge: Abrams
Referring Judge: Woehrle

Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Cable/Satellite TV
Cause: 47:521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: Both



Related:
The Reason Cyphris is Keeping a Low Profile

Echostar v. Panarex Case Upcoming Videotaped Depositions
http://www.ftabins.net/showthread.php?t=134971
 

Platinum Member
Username: Lklives

Post Number: 16147
Registered: Jan-06
Echostar v. Panarex (Pansat) Case Upcoming Videotaped Depositions

http://www.ftabins.net/showthread.php?t=134971
 

Platinum Member
Username: Lklives

Post Number: 16148
Registered: Jan-06
As U call see Pansat and Blacklist are in deep kimchee!
 

Bronze Member
Username: Ei_toro_the_great

Post Number: 92
Registered: Feb-10
LK , do you remember this guy....Tyler Durden
went by the name the wank artist?

I think he was here about the same time as Eva.
 

Platinum Member
Username: Lklives

Post Number: 16149
Registered: Jan-06
Yeah I do..Tyler and Eva...in fact, I always thought they were sorta an "item"...but I know Eva had a bunch of kids and lived in PR..
 

Platinum Member
Username: Nydas

Post Number: 18360
Registered: Jun-06
The following Motion based on the Defendant's 5th Ammendment Rights (because of pending Criminal case) was filed by
Jilbert Tahmazian, lawyer for the Defendant
in the
United District court
Central district of California
Motion to Stay Case (03-01-2010)


It is clear that Plaintiff is attempting to punish Defendant for asserting his 5th Amendment rights. Should the Court not grant the relief requested herein, Plaintiff will succeed in forcing Defendant into a default, because Defendant cannot testify in an effort to defend himself in this matter. Defendant Bagdasaryan cannot testify in the civil proceeding while there is an ongoing criminal investigation regarding the same events an effort to protect his Fifth Amendment Rights. He cannot produce documents in defense of this civil matter, without prejudicing himself in the ongoing criminal investigation.

He is essentially boxed-in by the risks of damaging her criminal matter. Bagdasaryan, therefore will not be available to testify or defend herself until after the conclusion of ongoing criminal investigation. In order to prevent a complete default or summary judgment against Defendant Bagdasaryan, (who has thus far attempted to do his best to balance the importance of this civil case in light the potential detriment) this Court should grant the relief requested.

WHEREFORE, in light of the foregoing, Defendant Bagdasaryan respectfully requests that the Court stay this civil action, including all pending matters and all discovery pending expiration of the criminal statute of limitations.

Dated: March 1, 2010
 

Bronze Member
Username: Ei_toro_the_great

Post Number: 100
Registered: Feb-10
one question is the Defendant Bagdasaryan a he or a she?

He is essentially boxed-in by the risks of damaging her criminal matter. Bagdasaryan, therefore will not be available to testify or defend herself until after the conclusion of ongoing criminal investigation.

Btw....this post got me 100, I still need 18,261 to pass Nalin Nyda
 

Bronze Member
Username: Harding

Post Number: 96
Registered: Dec-07
Interesting. There are similarities about he/she LK and he/she Bagdasaryan. LK started this thread. LK was a great promoter of BINs, which he/she claimed were made by Blacklist. Not a coincidence, for sure.
 

Bronze Member
Username: Yakkydoodle

Post Number: 41
Registered: Feb-10
interesting how the similarities between you and nalin are so remarkable. did you, perhaps, hatch from the same egg?
 

Platinum Member
Username: Plymouth

Canada

Post Number: 12962
Registered: Jan-08
Chopper

We can tell the same thing for you!
 

Silver Member
Username: Ei_toro_the_great

Post Number: 105
Registered: Feb-10
Plymouth why are you bashing the Chopper ?
show little class and apologize to the Chopper,
he was not talking to you.I believe he was talking
to Nalin that was bashing LK for no reason.

LK started this thread, now show us in this thread
where LK bash your friend and once again you are
protecting him.
 

Platinum Member
Username: Plymouth

Canada

Post Number: 12967
Registered: Jan-08
Whiskey

No!

Confident is not Nalin!

Nalin does not bashed LK on this thread!

You bashed Nalin!
 

Silver Member
Username: Ei_toro_the_great

Post Number: 108
Registered: Feb-10
OK you say Confident is not Nalin!
now show us were LK on this thread is bashing
Confident and you are protecting him
jumping on one of our outstanding
members the Chopper.
Please don't run you talk now back it up
show proof no more BS.
 

Bronze Member
Username: Yakkydoodle

Post Number: 43
Registered: Feb-10
thank you for the support whiskey. it is appreciated.

plymouth probably thought he was praising me with his statement. he most likely does not realize i know the real truth that nylon nada is nothing more than a crazy mixed up old lady with no life to speak of.

maybe harding is her twin sister then. they seem so much alike. it will probably boost both their ego's knowing they are so much alike that someone feels as though they are one in the same.

it is a pity though.... one is definitely more than enough as it is.....
 

Platinum Member
Username: Nydas

Post Number: 18367
Registered: Jun-06
Whiskey: It seems you problems started with this quesry- "Defendant Bagdasaryan a he or a she?"
I do not know. I don't know if there are two defendants, because they are referred to as Defendants



No - Confident is not me. He probably came from a cultured background similar to mine and was educated at good schools; hence the similarities you notice. I could post even more accurately about him/his origins from his posts, but I do not want to do that.
 

Platinum Member
Username: Lklives

Post Number: 16155
Registered: Jan-06
Blacklist is just one 1 man (definitely not a woman) from eastern Europe, with a heavy accent...English is his 2nd language..
 

Platinum Member
Username: Nydas

Post Number: 18374
Registered: Jun-06
If there is only one Blacklists why are tey referring to him as Defendants? This is exactly from the PDF file except that I had to put in the periods to move the period to the appropriate postion.


DISH NETWORK LLC.,a Colorado.... )
Limited Liability Company, et al. ........)
..................................................))
Plaintiff,....................................... )
...................................................)
v. ..............................................)))
KHACHIK BAGDASARYAN aka...... )
CHRIS BAGDASARYAN, )
Defendants.................................. )
 

Gold Member
Username: Dimwitt

Post Number: 1271
Registered: Aug-06
This might help you , Nalin

application/force-downloadUpload
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME.pdf (33.9 k)
 

Platinum Member
Username: Nydas

Post Number: 18387
Registered: Jun-06
It is a bit confusing. There is motion filed for Stay and then a motion filed for extension of time on the same day!
 

Silver Member
Username: Sump

Post Number: 947
Registered: Aug-09
two different tactics ..

if the stay is approved then all is well ... If not they want more time to prepare ..
 

Platinum Member
Username: Nydas

Post Number: 18404
Registered: Jun-06
I forgot to thank you Tooter. Keep on tooting, now and then.
« Previous Thread Next Thread »



Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us