Serious IKS news..

 

Platinum Member
Username: Lklives

Post Number: 15788
Registered: Jan-06
SandVine and Dishnet and IKS ... read this!!

-- Posted by soullezz
on Friday, May 23 2008

Dishnet has a contract with a company called sandvine (although like all isps do, they will not confirm this..but sandvine has), as do many of our US and canadian ISPs....now for those that dont know, this is deep packet sniffing/inspection headend software, and there no encryption that gets by it... This software was designed to beat bittorrent and to disable specific ports at a isp headend server, it also has the flexability to do nasty things) Any and ALL IKS units will be able to be filtered if your ISP has it... And if you ISP has it, then they have a direct path straight to your front door, and also remember , proxies dont work on your ISP.
When N3 hits (if they wait this long), i expect all IKS will get tv for 24-48 hours....then will give them long enough to filter it, knowing its N3 or N2 code.... and then they have a vaild case against you....see my point!! Tread Carefully guys...
 

Gold Member
Username: Saqeeb9000

Post Number: 3352
Registered: Oct-07
so lk is that software is able to detect that you have nfusion (iks reciever).? you said it has flexibility to do nasty things pls explain?
also how secure is nfusion now?
 

Silver Member
Username: Themangod

Post Number: 374
Registered: Oct-06
wow they are stopping some people from using torrents
 

Gold Member
Username: Runnerguy

Pluto

Post Number: 1418
Registered: Sep-06
Sandvine site: http://www.sandvine.com/
 

Silver Member
Username: Gregraf

Post Number: 677
Registered: Dec-07
Nalin Nyda is a LOSER dishnet mole and Coders likes to suck on moles
 

Platinum Member
Username: Nydas

Post Number: 10829
Registered: Jun-06
There is bigger power in the world than Sandvine, LK, Kate and mischief mongers, to guard your Internet use and not allow meddling.

What is needed is to stop people like LK and Kate from starting rumours. Their inly interest is to get you to their favourite sites.
 

Gold Member
Username: The_coders

Post Number: 1287
Registered: Jan-08
Detecting Ports Blocked by Your ISP

Internet service providers often block specific traffic entering their network before it reaches their customers, or after leaving their customers before it exits their network. This is sometimes done to block the exploitation of common security vulnerabilities, and sometimes to prevent their customers from offering proscribed Internet services.

As a customer, it can be useful and interesting to know which service ports, if any, an ISP has chosen to preemptively block in order to restrict their customers' global Internet traffic.

ISP port blocking can be easily tested, often quite rapidly, by arranging to allow the ShieldsUP! probe to have access to an unprotected computer. Since all non-stealth machines will respond to every open request -- either affirmatively or negatively -- ports appearing as STEALTH will be those blocked by your ISP, corporate firewall, or other external agency.


If your system is unprotected, without any personal firewall or NAT router, any ports showing as stealth are being blocked somewhere between your computer and the public Internet. This is probably being done by your ISP. Internet traffic directed to your computer at the stealth ports will be dropped before reaching your machine.


If your system has a personal firewall that can be instructed to "trust" a specific remote IP, you can temporarily instruct it to trust the ShieldsUP! probe IP of [4.79.142.206]. If, after doing so, most of the service ports change to either open or closed , you have succeeded and any which remain stealth are being blocked by your ISP.


If your system is operating behind a residential "NAT" router, the router will be acting as a natural and excellent hardware firewall. But that's not what you want for the moment. You can temporarily remove your NAT router and connect an unprotected computer directly to your cable modem or DSL line. Or, if you are comfortable reconfiguring your NAT router, you may be able to point the router's "DMZ" at one of your computers which has been instructed to "trust" our probe IP of [4.79.142.206]. If, after doing so, most of the service ports change to either open or closed , you have succeeded and any remaining stealth are being blocked by your ISP.


Finally, if your Internet security system, NAT router, personal firewall, or whatever, can produce detailed logs of incoming Internet packets, you could leave your existing security in place, clear your log, run the service ports scan, then carefully inspect your log for any consistently missing port probes. We send out four sets of probing packets because individual packets are sometimes dropped along the way. Therefore, it won't be unusual to see occasional missing packets from your logs. What you're looking for is a complete lack of packets bound for a specific port. A careful and detailed examination of your log will reveal any missing ports which are being blocked before they reach your logging tool. (Note that this technique is not quite as foolproof as the other approaches since ISPs could be blocking outbound packets from their customers, which the other approaches would detect but log-watching would not.)

After completing the experiments above, remember to return your system to its previous tight security and verify that everything is safe again by re-running any of our tests.


https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2
 

Silver Member
Username: Tigger_woods

CURRENTLY RUNNING NAGRA 3VIP DIAMOND ...

Post Number: 586
Registered: Jun-07
Turn to Jesus before it is to late
 

Gold Member
Username: Runnerguy

Pluto

Post Number: 1421
Registered: Sep-06
 
 

Silver Member
Username: Tigger_woods

CURRENTLY RUNNING NAGRA 3VIP DIAMOND ...

Post Number: 590
Registered: Jun-07
according to JD POWER and ASSOCIATES, ecoustics satellite forum is #1

ZULU was voted worst
 

Gold Member
Username: Tapeman

New York City in-HD, NY

Post Number: 2779
Registered: Oct-06
Again this is my expressed opinion

I always said IKS is the worst PTA
It does indead brings a smoking gun with reasonable doubt to get a warrent for arrest

I don't know if that report is real or not
But common sense tells me
Yo abreach their security the'll strike back

IKS
They can get a trace back to yor house via IP address and since yor internet is either by cable or by phone leaving trils back to yor front door with hard evidence

If yo already own an IKS
I strongly advice yo load bins the regular way
At least yo'll have more rights
 

Gold Member
Username: Plymouth

Quebec city, Quebec Canada

Post Number: 2493
Registered: Jan-08
I agree with KING

My opinion :Copy and past from another thread

Mr Shah with experience i have, i dont and never trust IKS.
You never know if files come from safe server.
Internet provider can take the adress and give to you bad files.
I prefer load from different sites, normally i download the first i found and i'm sure this file is not corrupt.

Thanks

https://www.ecoustics.com/electronics/forum/home-video/399896.html
 

Gold Member
Username: Plymouth

Quebec city, Quebec Canada

Post Number: 2494
Registered: Jan-08
IKS is the best hacking proof in court
 

Gold Member
Username: Cartier1

Post Number: 1886
Registered: Feb-07
POEPLE YOU SELL THE MONKEY AND YOU LAUGH AT THE ONE WHO BOUGHT IT.
 

Bronze Member
Username: Thoronto

Post Number: 42
Registered: Jun-06
It is funny how according to all of you, they would come to my door step but not at the company selling the devices which are well market on their own site. There is no such thing as people going to your door step, I have it, I am using and end of the story.
 

Bronze Member
Username: Thoronto

Post Number: 43
Registered: Jun-06
Another way to look at it. We all remember the Lime wire,nutela, Kaza days where everyone was downloading MP3 music all night. Did anybody show up at your door step because you were ilegally downloading music? Same thing my friends.
 

Silver Member
Username: King_of_sats

Post Number: 257
Registered: Jan-08
Many kaza users where sued..

Upload
 

Gold Member
Username: Plymouth

Quebec city, Quebec Canada

Post Number: 2497
Registered: Jan-08
Guys this is my opinion and i respect yours
 

Bronze Member
Username: Carcpl58

Post Number: 87
Registered: Oct-05
Yes they did, it cost a friend of mine $4,000.00 to settle rather than go to court and risk losing much more. They will come to your door!!!
 

Bronze Member
Username: Redwater71

Post Number: 52
Registered: Sep-06
I don't think it's the same as lime wire and other downloads.

It could be quite simple for an ISP to target out one IP and who's hitting it. Logs are there for a reason, thus giving authorities (if needed) the upper hand.

ISP's can control pretty mych what they want, isn't there a part of eastern europe that are blocked from FaceBook ?? and lately they've been throttling bandwidth during peek hours ..

It's a smoking gun theory ... we'll see
 

Bronze Member
Username: Thoronto

Post Number: 45
Registered: Jun-06
Yes but the ones that got sued were taking a step further then just downloading music, they were reselling and making the process into their own business. The question is, what is the difference of coming to my door step or going were the servers are? I understand they are overseas somewhere, but I am not in the US either.
 

New member
Username: Extremetester04

Post Number: 10
Registered: Feb-08
just my 2 cents ..
i think they can bust anyone that downloads bins at sites or upload them ,to me there is no differnce then iks ,even if they did bust everyone with iks receivers that will be one of the biggest bust ever in history , me honestly there not after little peons like us , they will go after and track down where is the server first.the (root) cause is server, without server there will be no iks ..
like thoronto said above there is no differnce from dl music from limewire or people who download new movies that just came out in movie theater yesturday ,and burn them and sell them for 5 bucks at fleamarket ,question his why do all pc's come with dvd burner and cd burner ? why do we need these options and you cant dl a movie and music. wtf do we need it ? why did they ever come out with dvd burner if you copy a dvd u are in wrong doing ,lol,now today they sell blu ray receorders to copy blu rays , they sell them at bestbuy for big bucks but why ?FTA has grown in last few years i cant imagine how many people today has a FTA receiver , at this point i see no end of it ,to big, to much money involved in it ..
 

Gold Member
Username: Plymouth

Quebec city, Quebec Canada

Post Number: 2498
Registered: Jan-08
In Canada download free music is LEGAL.
All Recorder can be use for data and personnal picture and video.
Sony(Sony Music) dont have choice to sell recorder bcause competition will sell it and Sony dont want loose big money.
 

Bronze Member
Username: Similarevil

Post Number: 25
Registered: Apr-08
this could be the best artical ive ever seen here....no flaming, only true honest opinions....
 

Silver Member
Username: Kingsatman

James McPhuck

Post Number: 334
Registered: Nov-07
I'm the real King of Sats
Jimmy stole it from me
And I just re-gained it

Too bad he won't need it anymore and would never take it away from this time

My opinion on IKS that it sux
Thank yo
 

Gold Member
Username: Donnie1973

Post Number: 3022
Registered: May-06
the thing about downloading a BIN, is u can choose to go to a local hot spot and download it. They cant trace u. U can use a neighbors internet, u arent CONNECTED to the server 24/7.
Thats a HUGE difference.
Finally... i agree with king on something.
I said it from the beginning they can get you very easy using IKS boxes. If they want too.
MANY people were sued using napster and kaza, and others. This is just as easy to trace.
All the worries for what... 4-8 hrs of more tv a week??? Not worth it. IMO
 

Bronze Member
Username: Adam2436

Post Number: 27
Registered: Mar-07
IMO blocking ports is a short lived measure, even if they decide to take all troubles to do so (ISPs have little incentive to block low volume ports uless legally forced to). I can easily think of two ways to defeat this:

1. Coders can change port to any number easily, including port 80 for http.

2. IKS packets can be encrypted and the sniffers have no way to decide the real inside port number and contents.
 

Bronze Member
Username: Thoronto

Post Number: 47
Registered: Jun-06
I have not seen anybody or anyone that has received a visit from anybody with regards to IKS. It is BS... getting the file from the Internet or downloading from one of who knows how many site is the same thing... they could get you either way... think about it, buying weed is one thing, selling is another... I am just buying for now (((-:
 

Bronze Member
Username: Jgrumby

Post Number: 57
Registered: Dec-07
buying weed is one thing, selling is another

yeah, but smoking it in public will get you busted quicker....
« Previous Thread Next Thread »



Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us