Bronze Member Username: Skial123Littleton, Colorado USA Post Number: 11 Registered: Jul-04 | I am looking for a new reciver and I've heard the Onkyo TX-8211 is a good one? Does anyone have any comments about this receiver? |
New member Username: AudiophiliacBoise, ID USA baby Post Number: 4 Registered: Jul-04 | Have you listened to or seen it yet? Thats the only way to find out for sure is to do comparisons on your own. Everyone's eyes and ears are different. What sounds great to one, may sound like horse crap to another....so get out there and test-drive. |
Silver Member Username: EdisonGlendale, CA US Post Number: 399 Registered: Dec-03 | I like the TX-8511 much better. It is 100 watts per ch, and it brings life to music. Believe me, you will be happy to have spent only $100 more for it. It is wide current and discreet design giving pretty smooth sound mimicking the sound of an upscale piece. http://www.bndonline.com/adnet1/ontxju2bnehi.html http://www.audioreview.com/PRD_118697_1593crx.aspx |
New member Username: RpenuchPost Number: 4 Registered: Jul-04 | I have the 8511 and LOVE IT! |
Bronze Member Username: Skial123Littleton, Colorado USA Post Number: 12 Registered: Jul-04 | I can get the 8211 for $100 and the 8511 for $250. I really don't want to spend an extra $150 for a receiver with features I don't need: the 8511 has 2 video inputs that I don't need and will never use. Do you think I should find a different receiver? |
Silver Member Username: EdisonGlendale, CA US Post Number: 415 Registered: Dec-03 | I think you should go with the 8511. $150 more is not that much to spend for good music for a long time to come - there are some who spent as much as a car or a house for that pleasure. I really think you will be happier with the 8511 - it just sounds more involving and lively than 8211. I can't think of a better receiver for that amount, unless you buy used at www.audiogon.com If you want to go that route, a NAD or a parasound is a good one to hunt down. |