Marantz Vs. H/K For Jbl Studios

 

Anonymous
 
Can anyone describe the sound diffrences between these two,i have heard they are both warm, are there any more diffrences? Also what brand is better for Movies? the models im looking at are the Marantz sr-6400 and H/k 430.
 

ron
Unregistered guest
All I know about these is anecdoltal from using other models from both manufacturers previously and from reading lots of reviews.The marantz will have more detail and a better midrange presentation.I think the marantz is a better receiver.If your speakers are good(which i think they are)I think you will get better sound using the marantz.
 

Silver Member
Username: Kegger

MICHIGAN

Post Number: 127
Registered: Dec-03
the main difference between these two recievers
is that one has 6 channels of amp 1 rear center
(the marantz) and the other has 7 so it has 2
rear centers (the h/k).

i like both the marantz units and the h/k's when
i was lookin into recievers i choose the hk 525
versus it's marantz counterpart but it was close
they do sound very simular.

i liked the 7 channels (not needed) but i liked it.

also the hk unit's are generally quite heavier
than the other units with larger power supplies
and more amperage than most.

sometimes they will be rated much lower wattage
wise than others but they are still heavier and
produce more amperage (you do the math)!

well that is my opinion, hope it helps!
« Previous Thread Next Thread »



Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us