Lanzar opti4000d or autotek mm 3000.1d

larissh famer New member Username: Laleezy Jacksonville, Fl Usa Post Number: 7 Registered: Jan-09	Posted on Monday, January 05, 2009 - 17:20 GMT WHICH OF THESE IS THE BETTER AMP.I'M TRYING TO RUN 2 PIONEER TS-W5102SPL SUBS.THEY'RE RATED 5000PEAK 2500RMS.ALSO USING 4 KINETIK 1800 BATTERIES
M.S. Gold Member Username: Nd4spd18 Philadelphia, PA Post Number: 9414 Registered: Jul-06	Posted on Monday, January 05, 2009 - 17:59 GMT autotek > lanzar
I- Malik Silver Member Username: Imalik 15 SI Mag9.1=Boom, New Jersey Jerzee Playa Post Number: 636 Registered: May-06	Posted on Saturday, January 10, 2009 - 18:03 GMT Autotek hands down
Optidriven Gold Member Username: N2audio Lawrence, Ks USA Post Number: 1709 Registered: Mar-04	Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 04:00 GMT Hmm, a glorified HF vs Lanzar's flagship... I don't see how it's a "hands down" decision. Lanzar should give you more power. Reliability/quality is a toss up IMO. Unless the Atek is significantly cheaper I think the Lanzar's the better option.
M.S. Gold Member Username: Nd4spd18 Philadelphia, PA Post Number: 9474 Registered: Jul-06	Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 05:19 GMT My decision was based on efficiency..... I have seen a bench test of that lanzar and the 1 ohm efficiency was terrible, around 60% I believe.
Mark Brockman Gold Member Username: Hittin1 TEAM REVOLUTIONLake Charles... Post Number: 2187 Registered: May-07	Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 13:59 GMT mean machine
Canaan Gold Member Username: Southernrebel Monroe, Louisiana Team Audible... Post Number: 7210 Registered: Mar-04	Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 16:55 GMT What is your budget?
Optidriven Gold Member Username: N2audio Lawrence, Ks USA Post Number: 1711 Registered: Mar-04	Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 18:11 GMT *"My decision was based on efficiency..... I have seen a bench test of that lanzar and the 1 ohm efficiency was terrible, around 60% I believe"* Hmm, strange. The 2kd was >80% (86 IIRC) at 1/2 ohm. The 6kd I could only find 2 ohm eff. for but it was 74% A test at CAF has the xxx6500 at 69% at 1.5 ohms and about 11.5v. What are the real world eff. numbers for the A-tek?
larissh famer New member Username: Laleezy Jacksonville, Fl Usa Post Number: 8 Registered: Jan-09	Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 20:04 GMT I just bought 2 audioque 2200d amp. i thought they were mono amps but it seems to be a 2 channel
Mark Brockman Gold Member Username: Hittin1 TEAM REVOLUTIONLake Charles... Post Number: 2195 Registered: May-07	Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 21:24 GMT they are mono amps.. the two sets of speaker outputs are for convenience only and are internally paralleled
Mark Brockman Gold Member Username: Hittin1 TEAM REVOLUTIONLake Charles... Post Number: 2196 Registered: May-07	Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 21:26 GMT good choice of amps btw.. i hope you plan on upgraging your electrical and charging system. Big 3, alt, battery.
larissh famer New member Username: Laleezy Jacksonville, Fl Usa Post Number: 9 Registered: Jan-09	Posted on Friday, January 16, 2009 - 00:03 GMT I already upgraded my alt to a 200amp but i still need to do the big 3.I'm plan on using 2 kinetik hc2000 batteries.i'm using 2 poineer premier ts-w5102 subs they're rated 5000peak 2500rms(dual 2 ohm voice coils)with a aq2200d on each sub
albert New member Username: Slappers Bay area, Cali United states Post Number: 2 Registered: Feb-09	Posted on Thursday, February 05, 2009 - 04:30 GMT let me know how those pioneer subs are. they're not in to many forums!!!!

« Previous Thread Next Thread »

Main Forums

Forum Help

Follow Us