Gold Member Username: Theweasel2 12 FI SSD, Colorado U.S. of A Post Number: 1179 Registered: Mar-06 | i am so confused as to what to get now. i want 2 15's that will dominate everything below 40 hz, dont worry about upper bass. i wanna slam songs like "soul survivor" and "put it down", the lowest of songs. here's what ive narrowed it down to fi q fi bl re sx ss rl-p aa havoc help please! |
Platinum Member Username: WingmanaliveA pic is worth 1000 posts!! Post Number: 17157 Registered: Jun-06 | SS for the excursion. |
Gold Member Username: FrkkevinTeam DLSSuperNatural... Post Number: 5244 Registered: Nov-05 | old xxxs :P |
Gold Member Username: Theweasel2 12 FI SSD, Colorado U.S. of A Post Number: 1180 Registered: Mar-06 | havoc says 30mm of xmax lol, but ive heard questionable things about them and there harder to get ahold of than bin laden |
Gold Member Username: Theweasel2 12 FI SSD, Colorado U.S. of A Post Number: 1182 Registered: Mar-06 | ^^1000w good enough for old xxx's? each? |
Gold Member Username: Nd4spd18Northwest PA Post Number: 7794 Registered: Jul-06 | I'd say the Q, or like kevin said old XXX. Definetly not the BL or SX, those are designed for more SPL rather than low end. |
Gold Member Username: Nd4spd18Northwest PA Post Number: 7795 Registered: Jul-06 | " 1000w good enough for old xxx's? each? " Yes |
Gold Member Username: Theweasel2 12 FI SSD, Colorado U.S. of A Post Number: 1183 Registered: Mar-06 | i read on soundsolutions that the BL could hit great on any lows hip hop can throw at it. and the sx is more low oriented than that i think. so im still leaving that door open unless someone who has had or heard one can argue that |
Gold Member Username: Nd4spd18Northwest PA Post Number: 7797 Registered: Jul-06 | I'm not saying the BL and SX don't hit the lows good, but they are simply not low end oriented subs. The Q and old XXX are. Look at the FS of the subs being considered to get a rough idea..... |
Gold Member Username: Theweasel2 12 FI SSD, Colorado U.S. of A Post Number: 1186 Registered: Mar-06 | well the sx actually has a fs of 27.x hz, which is close to the rl-p d4 and not too far above the q. and it has a higher force factor of about 21 bl. i think i've ruled out the bl now tho |
Silver Member Username: Hittin1Lake Charles, La. United States Post Number: 476 Registered: May-07 | atleast take a look ay IDMAXX.. .. woundn't hurt..made for low end.. |
Gold Member Username: 420alldaylongPost Number: 3710 Registered: Sep-06 | Fi Q's at 32Hz |
Silver Member Username: KingtutusLincoln, Nebraska U.s.a Post Number: 321 Registered: Dec-07 | Fi Q's @ 29hz |
Gold Member Username: Nyyfan1315 Mag USA Post Number: 9902 Registered: Jul-06 | 1 RL-s I hear they have decent low end..... ::sarcasm for the idiots: |
Gold Member Username: FrkkevinTeam DLSSuperNatural... Post Number: 5245 Registered: Nov-05 | my SXs got low, but not where near like my old XXX.. |
Gold Member Username: Theweasel2 12 FI SSD, Colorado U.S. of A Post Number: 1187 Registered: Mar-06 | im thinking of the q's, gotta love the value. but the rl-p interests me, except the d4 version seems lacking to the d2. im gonna do 8 cu ft, what should i tune to. i was thinking 30 hz |
Gold Member Username: Drant19DUB-C, TX Post Number: 1079 Registered: Aug-07 | 2 15" Q's @ 28Hz... R@PE the LOWS!! |
Gold Member Username: TejcurrentPost Number: 1405 Registered: Apr-07 | X2. Q ftw. |
Silver Member Username: KingtutusLincoln, Nebraska U.s.a Post Number: 322 Registered: Dec-07 | X3 q ftw |
Gold Member Username: Theweasel2 12 FI SSD, Colorado U.S. of A Post Number: 1191 Registered: Mar-06 | alright q's it is! thanks guys |
Gold Member Username: FrkkevinTeam DLSSuperNatural... Post Number: 5249 Registered: Nov-05 | meh, Qs FTL |
Gold Member Username: Theweasel2 12 FI SSD, Colorado U.S. of A Post Number: 1195 Registered: Mar-06 | ^ such a bonerkill lol |
Gold Member Username: Kingandsons07Lincoln, NE TEAM RD U.S.A Post Number: 1042 Registered: Feb-07 | lol Q's FTMFW now its over everyone is happy |