|
Gold Member Username: 420alldaylongPost Number: 3439 Registered: Sep-06 | If you have seen this my bad if not check it out. http://www.orioncaraudio.com/Promos/HCCA_Challenge_Results.aspx |
|
Gold Member Username: HdubbTeam Revolution Post Number: 3509 Registered: Nov-04 | yarp. =( what a joke.nothin against the hccca but the subs they chose to compare to. I take that as seriously as I take pimp my ride and the jackhammer |
|
Gold Member Username: Philly306New quote coming soon, North carolina Post Number: 1029 Registered: Apr-07 | Did you see the amps they were using? OMG |
|
Gold Member Username: Dakangofkrunk16Boca Raton, Florida Post Number: 1417 Registered: May-07 | Forget about the subs they compared it to... Just look at how long it lasted 1 hour 30 minutes on 6000 watts peak 3500 rms not bad for a 2000 watt rated sub if you ask me.. but you didnt |
|
Gold Member Username: SouthernrebelMonroe, Louisiana 2 DD3515s, 2... Post Number: 6238 Registered: Mar-04 | You have to love the complete and total BS in that 'test'. Its laughable. Think about it. -The other subs were rated: 1000, 600, 750, 2500, and 2000w. -Most of those other subs were made for ported boxes not sealed. -They only checked RMS voltage to 'calculate' power output. No amperage...lol (tards) They only used the subs nominal resistance to 'calculate' power. -HCCA has a 4" coil, most of the others had 3" or so. -No mention was ever made of any of the subs' efficiency. If you have a sub that can soak up 5000w, woopteedo...but is that all waste??? |