Platinum Member Username: Rovin4 10 Pioneer... Post Number: 11938 Registered: Jul-05 | For those who always wondering\asking if 2 of this size speaker will have more suface area than 2 of that & feeling lazy to work it out - check this out : http://www.iasca.com/classes/chart.php man they even did the math for 64 woofers too ..... |
Gold Member Username: Skibum12189Cleveland Post Number: 1339 Registered: Mar-06 | thats awesome but i honestly hope people can figure that sh!t out by themselves... Pi R ^2 |
Gold Member Username: WingmanaliveA pic is worth 1000 posts!! Post Number: 9156 Registered: Jun-06 | Added to fav's. Thanks Rovin. |
Gold Member Username: Skibum12189Cleveland Post Number: 1345 Registered: Mar-06 | haha who has 64 18" subs |
Silver Member Username: Phil_salisburyPost Number: 291 Registered: Sep-06 | That chart maybe good if your trying to guessimate surface area for subwoofers, but, if IASCA is using that chart as a " standard " for competition classification, then it's a load of crap because not all subwoofers of the same size have exactly the same cone surface area. |
Silver Member Username: M0nkeyman692Post Number: 284 Registered: Feb-07 | but it does help for example if you have 2 12in ssd's and one 18in ssd and you want to know which has more sa.. since the cones are built the same just at different scales |
Silver Member Username: Phil_salisburyPost Number: 292 Registered: Sep-06 | " but it does help for example if you have 2 12in ssd's and one 18in ssd and you want to know which has more sa.. since the cones are built the same just at different scales " Well, that would only be true if the geometry of the cones is all the same as to to depth of the cone and angle of the cone and since manufacturer's don't state this geometry as part of the t/s parameters, then you cannot be certain as to what that chart implies. Besides, most manufacturer's list the cone area of the subs in the t/s parameters as (Sd). |