Bronze Member
Username: Goodie_goop Midland,
Texas
U.S.
Post Number: 89 Registered: Oct-06
Posted on
Saturday, January 06, 2007 - 08:34 GMT whats the difference between the zx and sx?
Bronze Member
Username: Goodie_goop Midland,
Texas
U.S.
Post Number: 90 Registered: Oct-06
Posted on
Saturday, January 06, 2007 - 08:36 GMT besides 1 ohm and 2 ohm stability?
Gold Member
Username: Juliob Santo DomingoDominican Re...
Post Number: 3822 Registered: Dec-05
Posted on
Saturday, January 06, 2007 - 16:33 GMT newer line. SX is better IMO I think SX has more functions
Gold Member
Username: Logan__tille [:-]15 RE XXX[:-]
Post Number: 4375 Registered: Feb-06
Posted on
Monday, January 08, 2007 - 02:51 GMT zx is newer
Bronze Member
Username: Skibum12189 Post Number: 60 Registered: Mar-06
Posted on
Tuesday, January 09, 2007 - 04:49 GMT ZX is newer and the amps are not 1 ohm stable
New member
Username: Jacobd Seattle,
WA
U.S.
Post Number: 7 Registered: Dec-06
Posted on
Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 05:10 GMT check out kicker.com. they have some good illustrations and explain what is so special about each amp.
Gold Member
Username: Safe_cracker Chicago,
IL
US
Post Number: 2335 Registered: Jan-06
Posted on
Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 06:54 GMT The KX and SX @ 1200 rms is 1ohm stable. Now @ 2500 rms the SX and KX becaomes 2ohm stable. The SX is the best amp they have and I doubt they will be able to replace it. Think about it the SX has been around since 2004 and has not been changed to date! Polo..