174 dBs vs 160 dBs

aLeX Silver Member Username: Alexv305 Tavernier, FL USA Post Number: 409 Registered: Oct-05	Posted on Monday, September 11, 2006 - 03:43 GMT I dont get this, ha ha i would like some opinions. American bass claims 174 dBs with two VFL 15s Pete from team toxic bass hit 160 with two soundstream triple X 15s. Now those of you who kno ur subs kno the triple X 15s from soundstream make the VFL 15s look like M&Ms... What u think?
marshall white Gold Member Username: Southernrebel Monroe, Louisiana USA Post Number: 3286 Registered: Mar-04	Posted on Monday, September 11, 2006 - 03:47 GMT 174db w/ VFLs was in an extreme vehicle. concrete and steal...VERY small cabin.
andy F Silver Member Username: Andysd03 Post Number: 412 Registered: Jan-06	Posted on Monday, September 11, 2006 - 05:12 GMT you would need reinforced glass to withstand 174 db and reinforced metal around the car or that would also break!!!174 is intense ud need at least 5 to 10000watts rms or some really efficient subs
Wahl Gold Member Username: Sploosh56 Ohio Post Number: 1488 Registered: May-04	Posted on Monday, September 11, 2006 - 17:14 GMT a lot of it depends on the install
Brandon Gold Member Username: Theelfkeeper Stockbridge, GA USA Post Number: 2914 Registered: Feb-05	Posted on Monday, September 11, 2006 - 19:15 GMT 90% install, 10% equiptment in high end SPL comp cars. its all about manipulating the mic. but 174 vs. 160 is like almost 5X as loud.
Scott Atwell New member Username: Fi_car_audio Hades, NV Post Number: 9 Registered: Sep-06	Posted on Tuesday, September 12, 2006 - 07:33 GMT Now 160 with music for a daily car is a different story Youll be seeing more of these pop up in the not too distant future...

« Previous Thread Next Thread »

Main Forums

Forum Help

Follow Us