TOP TEN

 

New member
Username: Allstar13

Post Number: 5
Registered: Jul-06
i was wondering what everybodies personal opinion is and if u want to can u post ur top ten subs over all, top ten spl subs, and top ten sq subs.
 

Silver Member
Username: John_wash

Nashville, Tennessee

Post Number: 387
Registered: Dec-05
dats a lot of work Micheal lol. I think u should make it top 5 of each
 

Gold Member
Username: Illuminator

USA

Post Number: 3618
Registered: Apr-05
Why?
 

Gold Member
Username: Illuminator

USA

Post Number: 3619
Registered: Apr-05
J-Dub posted at the same time haha. Yeah, are you looking for a good sub? Tell us what you want and we can help you. Top ten lists are kind of pointless if they don't fit your needs.
 

New member
Username: Allstar13

Post Number: 6
Registered: Jul-06
if u want to post it go ahead and make it top five if u want i dont really need it for any reason i was just wondering what other people like the best for personal curiosity and future reference
 

Silver Member
Username: Theweasel

Steamboat springs, Colorado U.S. of A

Post Number: 544
Registered: Mar-06
sql

1 RE XXX
2 treo ssx
3 dd 9500
4 jl w7
5 AA havoc
6 si mag
7 crystal compx
8 treo ssi
9 AA arsenal
10 ss rl-p

sq
1 jl w6v2
2 id max
3 alpine type x
4 adire brahma
5 re se
6 jl w3
7 aa assassin
8 ss rl-i
9 ?
10 ?

spl

1 mtx jackhammer
2 neo sig
3 re mt
4 atomic apx
5 dd 9900
6 treo csx
7 kicker solo x
8 orion h2
9 re sx
10 kicker L7

i don't know many staight spl subs so about the last half of that list is my favorite decible per dollar subs
 

Silver Member
Username: Theweasel

Steamboat springs, Colorado U.S. of A

Post Number: 545
Registered: Mar-06
sql

1 RE XXX
2 treo ssx
3 dd 9500
4 jl w7
5 AA havoc
6 si mag
7 crystal compx
8 RE mx
9 treo ssi
10 AA arsenal

sq
1 jl w6v2
2 id max
3 alpine type x
4 adire brahma
5 re se
6 ss rl-p
7 aa assassin
8 ss rl-i
9 jl W3
10 alpine type r

spl

1 mtx jackhammer
2 neo sig
3 re mt
4 atomic apx
5 dd 9900
6 treo csx
7 kicker solo x
8 orion h2
9 re sx
10 kicker L7

i don't know many staight spl subs so about the last half of that list is my favorite decible per dollar subs
 

Gold Member
Username: Extrmndor3

Chicago, Ill Us

Post Number: 1398
Registered: Feb-06
sq
jl audio w6
cdt gold
idmax
soundsplinter rl-s
re se

spl
atomic apxx
shocker neo sig
atomic apx
re audio mt
dd95
kicker solo x
 

Silver Member
Username: Karam

Post Number: 176
Registered: May-05
what happened to mtx's 9500 series??? there good arnt they...
 

Gold Member
Username: Pelona

Perres, California

Post Number: 1731
Registered: Dec-05
^^^haha!! hellz naw!!
 

Silver Member
Username: Atllefty12

Pinellas, Fla.

Post Number: 127
Registered: Jul-06
Would you be willing to say the RE XXX is the best overall subwoofer out of all those subs?
 

New member
Username: Th3pwn3r

Chicago, Illinois U.S.A

Post Number: 6
Registered: Jul-06
What about MA Dmx 12's shouldn't they be in the ranks?
 

Gold Member
Username: Basshead86

Google is your Friend, FL

Post Number: 4096
Registered: Aug-05
DD 9100 best SQ and best SQL.
best SPL...i have to give it up to DD 9918. there ya go.....now get out your Visa.:-O

those are completely subjective^^^^ i dont want to argue about it. thanks
 

Gold Member
Username: Lbeckner

Tulsa, Ok Usa

Post Number: 1062
Registered: Oct-04
hmmm no1 mentioned eclipse ti's
 

Silver Member
Username: Andysd03

Post Number: 324
Registered: Jan-06
u forgot to mention cerwin vega strokers their new ones look really good for SPL they do compare to dd9500 or 9900
 

Gold Member
Username: Pelona

Perres, California

Post Number: 1734
Registered: Dec-05
ya i kno noone mentioned ti's theyr waaay better than dd9500s in sql
 

Gold Member
Username: Basshead86

Google is your Friend, FL

Post Number: 4098
Registered: Aug-05
SQL______DD 9500=TI


SQL______DD9100 Pwn3S!!!!!! TI.:-O

hahahahahahahahahaa
 

Gold Member
Username: Pelona

Perres, California

Post Number: 1736
Registered: Dec-05
aint the 9500 more for spl though
 

Gold Member
Username: Basshead86

Google is your Friend, FL

Post Number: 4099
Registered: Aug-05
it is if you have it ordered with the multiple spiders.

you can have them custom ordered with 2 spiders instead of the bajillion.

and it drops the Fs down to 28hz. :-O:-O:-O:-O:-O:-O:-O


28hz with one of the most accurate and distortion free motors ever made....= pandelerium(jeff foxworthy). lol
 

Gold Member
Username: Pelona

Perres, California

Post Number: 1737
Registered: Dec-05
"pandelerium(jeff foxworthy). lol"

?????
 

Silver Member
Username: Frkkevin

Denton, Texas US

Post Number: 283
Registered: Nov-05
re sx 15s have a fs of 27.8... maybe thats why they sounded so clean :-)
 

Gold Member
Username: Basshead86

Google is your Friend, FL

Post Number: 4101
Registered: Aug-05

quote:

"pandelerium(jeff foxworthy). lol"

?????




he says that word(pandelerium) on one os his stand-up CD's. it describes pandamonium, but in redneck version. lolol

geeeeez pelon.:-O
 

Gold Member
Username: Jakeyplaysbass

St. Louis, MO

Post Number: 1313
Registered: Jul-05
"sql

1 RE XXX
2 treo ssx
3 dd 9500
4 jl w7
5 AA havoc
6 si mag
7 crystal compx
8 RE mx
9 treo ssi
10 AA arsenal

sq
1 jl w6v2
2 id max
3 alpine type x
4 adire brahma
5 re se
6 ss rl-p
7 aa assassin
8 ss rl-i
9 jl W3
10 alpine type r

spl

1 mtx jackhammer
2 neo sig
3 re mt
4 atomic apx
5 dd 9900
6 treo csx
7 kicker solo x
8 orion h2
9 re sx
10 kicker L7 "

rob theres no way youve heard all those subs, so why would you even make that list up?

muddy i think your forgetting about our little friend the idmax...9100...idmax...hmm?
 

Silver Member
Username: Theweasel

Steamboat springs, Colorado U.S. of A

Post Number: 562
Registered: Mar-06
i've heard some, and from what people have said on this forum i think it's a fairly reasonable list. i'm not saying it's perfect but it's something.
 

Silver Member
Username: Halter

Paulding, Ohio

Post Number: 164
Registered: Oct-05
Wheres the Memphis Mojo at?
 

Gold Member
Username: Extrmndor3

Chicago, Ill Us

Post Number: 1399
Registered: Feb-06
u all never heard an atomic apxx right??? u all heard only the apx ummmm i think if u had heard it u consider the apxx number 1 in spl also the jackhammer its for sq too u can change the coil to spl or sq, and the alpine type r its for sq????????? ummm i think everyone luvs the cvr better because they get louder and cleaner, and wat about the rl-s??? they have so muchhh sq than the rl-p they will beat the rl-p in sq and spl by alot, ummm and i forgot wat about the tc sounds tc3000???
 

Gold Member
Username: Drivingreckless

Near tampa, Florida United state...

Post Number: 1423
Registered: Apr-06
cvrs are definatly not cleaner the the type r's ur so full sh*t quit posting
 

Gold Member
Username: Extrmndor3

Chicago, Ill Us

Post Number: 1405
Registered: Feb-06
hahah yeah right dude if u said so
 

Gold Member
Username: Drivingreckless

Near tampa, Florida United state...

Post Number: 1425
Registered: Apr-06
no its back to elementary school again isnt it lil rob.....

its "...if u SAY so"
not "...if u said so"
 

Gold Member
Username: Lbeckner

Tulsa, Ok Usa

Post Number: 1063
Registered: Oct-04
ya i think cvr's sound bad. should the juggernauts be on the spl list?
 

Gold Member
Username: Lbeckner

Tulsa, Ok Usa

Post Number: 1064
Registered: Oct-04
When I said cvr's sound bad i mean that they don't sound very good. imo
 

Gold Member
Username: Basshead86

Google is your Friend, FL

Post Number: 4103
Registered: Aug-05
Coil configuration has nothingto do with SQ lilrob.

it has to do with getting a lower ohm load on an amp so you can put more power to it. it is a marketing gimmick
 

Silver Member
Username: Troy81

Tavernier, Fl Us

Post Number: 831
Registered: Mar-06
where r the mojos under the spl department?
 

Gold Member
Username: Lbeckner

Tulsa, Ok Usa

Post Number: 1065
Registered: Oct-04
1. everything except sony
2. mojos
 

Gold Member
Username: Lbeckner

Tulsa, Ok Usa

Post Number: 1066
Registered: Oct-04
1. everything except sony
2. mojos
3. sony
 

Silver Member
Username: Halter

Paulding, Ohio

Post Number: 169
Registered: Oct-05
^^^^^^^^^????^^^^^^^ yeah right...soo yours saying a couple of p1s could out bump a mojo...AHHA..and your full of it!!
 

Gold Member
Username: Extrmndor3

Chicago, Ill Us

Post Number: 1410
Registered: Feb-06
yje juggernaunt will be definatley a killer sub
but since i posted thse woofers
spl
atomic apxx
shocker neo sig
atomic apx
re audio mt
dd95
kicker solo x

i dont think the mmats will be killin all of those except for the kicker solo x and yeah the jugernaut its louder and cleaner than the mojo but yeah i luv those memphis mojos
 

Silver Member
Username: Loudon

Post Number: 432
Registered: Jun-04
memphis mojos sound like crap worse then any L7 ive heard ... and i wasnt impressed with their spl or sq ... ive heard a cvx's and l7s decimate that sub and sound BETTER doing it

neo sigs ... well if u know ne thing bout audio .. u know they are outstanding

atomics .. also amazing woofers all around their entire lineup of drivers

mts - arent meant for daily driving but if ur burping them in comp .. one of the best

dd - best sub made hands down .. IMHO

solo x's - they dont sound bad but they dont sound good .. enclosed and powered properly ... they get extremely loud and have serious excursion if ur into that kind of thing :-)
 

Gold Member
Username: Extrmndor3

Chicago, Ill Us

Post Number: 1413
Registered: Feb-06
mike london i have to agree with you but atomics apxx can outperform the shocker neo sig i seen it,

the regular apx was made to compete with the shocker neo sig,

the pxx was made to destroy the shocker neo sig and to have some good show while ur trowin 30k at burps to a atomic 18 inch apxx, now atomic want to built the ultimate beast so wait till the apxxx gets out,

but i dont think dd its the best sub, for me the jl audio w7 it was the best sub ever made why?? because it have lots of expirence the jl audio changed the way we looked at subs, back in the day all subs were made for spl or daily drivin but the team at jl audio took like years for research they developed the jl audio w series from the ugly black cones with the round thing in the middle dude all the manufactures wanted to be just like jl audio, infact jl audio havent updated the jl audio and its still the king for subwoofers, the jl audio have like 5-6 years since they came out and they havent been too much updated or remaked, and still sony, piooner, alpine, kicker ( the solo x wanted to compete with the w7 but cant even win in sql only for spl) even the mtx 9500that supposed to beat the jl audio w7, plus the jl's are know for ultimate sound quiality and super good spl, and they are not too power hungry , the jl audio u can hit like around 150 db's with a single 13w7 in a ho box with a jl audio 1k/1 and tell me where u can see a woofer move alot of air with like 1k rms to it???


jl audio best sub hads down, but all the woofers that i posted in spl can beat the jl audio but not in sound quiality not even the dd's
 

Silver Member
Username: Loudon

Post Number: 433
Registered: Jun-04
i think a w7 sounds like kinda muddy and sloppy ... i cant think of the word ... i just wasnt impressed... a jl sub i like is the w6v2 .. other then that i wasnt impressed with any of there line .. build quality .. great ... customer service .. great. .. but i think for so much less money and good warranties through companies u can do better ... my favorite all around sub would have to be the idmax 12 ... best sub ive ever heard IMO ... not to expensive ... it was given 1000 watts and took it like a champ ... no problem ... and was loud and sounded fantastic...
 

Gold Member
Username: Extrmndor3

Chicago, Ill Us

Post Number: 1415
Registered: Feb-06
yeah the id max its a great sub thats why i put it the sq category its a great sub get s loud and clean
 

Gold Member
Username: Extrmndor3

Chicago, Ill Us

Post Number: 1416
Registered: Feb-06
snd yes u right a again the jl audio 13w7 has some strange sound , it sounds weird but for me and alot of people that why they sound unique no other woofer have its own sound and its easy to wrok with the jl audio, they will get loud in almost any enclousure
 

Gold Member
Username: Lbeckner

Tulsa, Ok Usa

Post Number: 1071
Registered: Oct-04
"^^^^^^^^^????^^^^^^^ yeah right...soo yours saying a couple of p1s could out bump a mojo...AHHA..and your full of it!!"

Uhmm I do know that I wouldn't even consider buying a mojo sub. Thats all I'm saying.
 

New member
Username: Tcox_16

Post Number: 5
Registered: Jul-06
Ok i have a few questions...need help so please answer....ok...if i buy a line out converter...can i just hook it up near the rear speakers...like splice into them...or should i go behind the Head unit and splice them into the speaker wires...and one more question....does anyone know where to get a wiring diagram with color codes for a 2003 Doddge Durango SLT...or if ya dont' wanna do that then...where should i wire the remote turn on wire...and i need steps to do that for...and since i have a stock radio... i need to know the best place to hook the remote wire into too..thanx..
 

Gold Member
Username: Juliob

Santo DomingoDominican Re...

Post Number: 1388
Registered: Dec-05
alpine type X shouldn't be there in 3rd, there are better subs! this is not going to be an andy F thread lol!!!!! lmao
 

Gold Member
Username: Drivingreckless

Near tampa, Florida United state...

Post Number: 1427
Registered: Apr-06
im sry but lil fa*g get away from ecoustics u SU*CK!
 

Silver Member
Username: Astrosafari

Delhi, Ontario Canada

Post Number: 512
Registered: Aug-05
taylor cox, u cant do thta with a stock hu. you need rca outsm and i dont think many, if any, have rca jacks in them. remote wires, just signlas the amp to turn on... just take a little piece of wire from your power... or get aftermarket.
 

Gold Member
Username: Basshead86

Google is your Friend, FL

Post Number: 4105
Registered: Aug-05
i WOULD LOVE to see an IDMAX or a W7 outperform a DD9100 series.

it is just not gonna happen.
i know price has nothing to do with performance(to a certain degree) but the 9100 isn't second in price to the 9900 b/c it looks good. lol

the 9100 would kill the W7 in sound....even if it sounded ANYTHING like a 2500!!!! beleive me i know.

and the idmax....just doesn't have the excursion to keep up with the 9100 for those loooows.

end of thread.:-O
 

Gold Member
Username: Bestmankind

Los Angeles, CA USA

Post Number: 4490
Registered: Oct-05
muddy knows wassup.

hey muddy check your pm on the other forum.
 

Gold Member
Username: Basshead86

Google is your Friend, FL

Post Number: 4106
Registered: Aug-05
gotcha.:-O
 

Silver Member
Username: Loudon

Post Number: 436
Registered: Jun-04
muddy i agree with you .. im just going on what ive heard personally .. ive never heard a 9100 perform .. just through videos on roe or from word of mouth

i would love to hear some of those woofers just because there has never been a bad review about them ever ...
 

Bronze Member
Username: Econoline1

Vancity, Bc Canada eh

Post Number: 72
Registered: Jun-06
I have to agree with lilrob. I own a 13w7 along with the 1k/1. nothing is better for 1 sub @ 1k rms
 

Bronze Member
Username: Thriller73

Post Number: 12
Registered: Jul-06
Pelon is a a#%-clown. He is just dissing MTX because they are a piopular brand. The mtx 9500 is a top 5 SPL sub.
Anyone who says it is not is just showing off their lack of understanding of specs or never heard them before
 

Silver Member
Username: Loudon

Post Number: 437
Registered: Jun-04
top 5? thats not a true statement ... ive worked with those subs and they are no where near top 5 ... average - good spl at that but no where near some woofers ... id put it top 10 maybe .. depending on enclosure and power ...
 

Gold Member
Username: Extrmndor3

Chicago, Ill Us

Post Number: 1431
Registered: Feb-06
hahahah re u serious??? u think the matx 9500 its better sub than jlw7 because can handle more power???? too bad the jl audio can only take 2k max, but u know it will get loud the dd its a very nice sub and yes it will outperfomr the jl audio w7 but i think the jl audio will deserve some better reputation by the experience of the subwoofer
 

Gold Member
Username: Juliob

Santo DomingoDominican Re...

Post Number: 1438
Registered: Dec-05
DD is better, that's the point.

I wouldn't put the MTX so high, top 20. if you're looking for pure SPL, kicker should be on the list, those deserve a spot.
 

Gold Member
Username: Lbeckner

Tulsa, Ok Usa

Post Number: 1077
Registered: Oct-04
yeah mtx good, but not that good.
« Previous Thread Next Thread »



Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us