Cvr v. rl-p

 

New member
Username: Kyle_lowe

Post Number: 9
Registered: Apr-06
my friend has 2 12cvr's and i was wondering if 2 rl-p12's would outdo those cvr's
 

Gold Member
Username: Chaunb3400

Huntsville, Alabama U.S.

Post Number: 6492
Registered: Jul-05
rl-p's would own cvr's.lol i said own
 

Gold Member
Username: Tdeaton1021

Near Tampa, Florida USA

Post Number: 2479
Registered: Sep-04
definetly right there chauncy, hey did you ever follow through with getting comp xs to replace your L7s? or are you going to replace your L7s?
 

Bronze Member
Username: J_baby15

Kentucky

Post Number: 71
Registered: Feb-06
I'm replacing my L7. I think I may look into the Rl-p. Is it as good/better than the Treos?
 

Bronze Member
Username: Kyle_lowe

Post Number: 15
Registered: Apr-06
from what i have been told, the treo ssi will handle 1000wats rms although it is rated at 750 or 800. and the rl-p is rated at 500w rms(conservatively). the price difference is $20 with the treo costing more. the rl-p is best used in a smaller box though, 1.5 cubic feet i think, so if you are limited in space the i would go with the rl-p.
 

Gold Member
Username: Bestmankind

Los Angeles, CA USA

Post Number: 3654
Registered: Oct-05
i have 1000wrms going to my one of my treo ssi and its asking for more. there are some people on another forum that powers them with a 2000wrms amp for daily use.
 

Silver Member
Username: Alteraudiousa

Concord

Post Number: 612
Registered: Jan-06
i can't believe the RL-p and the CVR are being compared. RL-p owns its
« Previous Thread Next Thread »



Main Forums

Today's Posts

Forum Help

Follow Us