Silver Member Username: Scott_debakerPittsburgh, P.A. U.S.A. Post Number: 136 Registered: Feb-06 | say 2 12 sx an 2500watts in a 5.25cuft slot ported box tuned @ 30.5hz vs 1 15sx in a 5.25cuft with 1200 watts slot ported box tuned @ 30.5hz just wonderin whats louder an sound better 15 re sx, 15 treo ssi, aa audio 15 havoc,15 re mx, 15 si mag need the best soundin spl sq 15 sub that works best in a 5.25cuft slot ported box tuned @ 30.5hz need need loud bass lol |
Silver Member Username: Scott_debakerPittsburgh, P.A. U.S.A. Post Number: 137 Registered: Feb-06 | i mean the 15 treo ssx an whats all the prices on all the subs |
Silver Member Username: Extrmndor3Chicago, Ill Us Post Number: 227 Registered: Feb-06 | i think the new re audio mx will sound better cuz have more excursion and voice coil diameter than the new xxx have you seen the pictures of the mx?neo magnets ooooooooh man thats cool |
Bronze Member Username: Custom_boxesPost Number: 60 Registered: Mar-06 | i think but i didnt realli c it all that well u got a pic |
Silver Member Username: JakeyplaysbassSt. Louis, MO Post Number: 765 Registered: Jul-05 | the SSX is similar to the SX meaning there made for SPL but sound pretty good. i would put all 2500rms on a 15' SSX anyday. ive heard good things about the havocs and SI mags but havent had a chance to hear them. |
Gold Member Username: SouthernrebelMonroe, Louisiana USA Post Number: 2557 Registered: Mar-04 | the 2 SX12's on 2500w in 5.25cuft tuned to 30.5hz would most likly be the loudest...but i'll tell ya right now, 1 15" SX is loud as h3ll. the Si Mag 15 would be a good SQL choice (it leans toward SQ). no one other that RE and a few special people have had a chance to play w/ the MX15 yet. it is supposed to be a lil louder than the SX but w/ better SQ. (from what i hear) It has 22mm of xmax...same as the SX. |
Silver Member Username: Extrmndor3Chicago, Ill Us Post Number: 237 Registered: Feb-06 | https://www.ecoustics.com/electronics/forum/car-audio/211820.html |
Silver Member Username: Extrmndor3Chicago, Ill Us Post Number: 238 Registered: Feb-06 | hey marshal white i finished the box i removed the divider and did the port the port is tuned to 34-33 hz it has around 105 sq inches wat you think ill show you pics later thanks alot for the help man |
Silver Member Username: Safe_crackerChicago, IL US Post Number: 571 Registered: Jan-06 | the 2 SX12's on 2500w in 5.25cuft tuned to 30.5hz would most likly be the loudest...but i'll tell ya right now, 1 15" SX is loud as h3ll I would say that box is too small, they each require 3.5cf minimum for a ported enclosure not to mention the .18cf displacement for the sub alone. You would be better off with one single sub in that box. The MX is a poor mans XXX and will not get as loud as the XXX, but will still be louder than the SX. I heard a set of Si's but they weren't all that loud and except for the cone and motor backing, looked pretty dam close to an SX. I like my SX's and they are loud as hell, the only thing going to replace them is a SINGLE new XXX when they are released. Polo. |
Gold Member Username: SouthernrebelMonroe, Louisiana USA Post Number: 2559 Registered: Mar-04 | polo...SX12's perform very well in ~2cuft (net) ported inclosures...(RE actually recommends 1.9cuft tuned to 32hz for SQL) SX15's are the ones that like 3.5cuft. |
Silver Member Username: Safe_crackerChicago, IL US Post Number: 573 Registered: Jan-06 | Ya he did say 12's, just saw the sx15 in his original post. 5 cf for one sx15 is perfect. Polo.. |
Silver Member Username: Sw9152Michigan Post Number: 264 Registered: Feb-06 | a eclipse titanium 15" has more excursion that all ^^^ mentioned, (muhahahaha) ~44mm xmax and 3.5 inches of total excursion!!! |
Silver Member Username: Safe_crackerChicago, IL US Post Number: 575 Registered: Jan-06 | That doesn't mean sh!t, lol. New XXX is 54mm, what ya say to that? |