|
Silver Member Username: Jprix82Post Number: 264 Registered: Jan-06 | Which RE sub compares to a JL W6v2? |
|
Gold Member Username: James1115Ct Post Number: 5341 Registered: Dec-04 | in what SQ or SPL? I would say the se's are most comparable but they sound nothing alike. |
|
Silver Member Username: Jprix82Post Number: 265 Registered: Jan-06 | IDK my cousin loves the W6's but he cannot afford 1 but i would say he likes how loud they get so i would say SPL or SQL |
|
Gold Member Username: James1115Ct Post Number: 5344 Registered: Dec-04 | RE sx |
|
Silver Member Username: Jprix82Post Number: 266 Registered: Jan-06 | "I would say the se's are most comparable but they sound nothing alike." What do you mean by that? |
|
Gold Member Username: Jonathan_fGA USA Post Number: 5690 Registered: May-04 | SEs are most comparable output-wise. The SX and XXX will get louder. Personally I like the SQ of W6v2s better than all of them. |
|
Gold Member Username: Suleman36Maryland U.S.A. Post Number: 3236 Registered: Feb-05 | If you like the W6v2's SQ then look into the Image Dynamics IDQ series Subwoofers http://www.imagedynamicsusa.com/products_page.php?id=idq&type=sub |
|
Platinum Member Username: GlasswolfWisteria, Lane USA Post Number: 11344 Registered: Dec-03 | The SE is on par with the W6v2 the XXX with the W7. |
|
Silver Member Username: Scott_debakerPittsburgh, P.A. U.S.A. Post Number: 101 Registered: Feb-06 | then what is with the sx |
|
Silver Member Username: Greeney1888Maple Grove, MN United States Post Number: 212 Registered: Feb-06 | Most people say the SX is a SPL sub but i disagree. Id say the SX is a SQL sub. Has good SQ while getting very loud for a sub. I think most people who own a SX would agree with me on this one too. |