Silver Member
Username: Lexuscoop Post Number: 850 Registered: Dec-05
Posted on
Monday, February 20, 2006 - 18:20 GMT why is the CSX so much more is it better than the W7 or what, i don't understand this
Gold Member
Username: Southernrebel Monroe,
Louisiana
USA
Post Number: 2215 Registered: Mar-04
Posted on
Monday, February 20, 2006 - 18:53 GMT cause its new
Gold Member
Username: Tdeaton1021 Near Tampa,
Florida
USA
Post Number: 1962 Registered: Sep-04
Posted on
Monday, February 20, 2006 - 19:08 GMT the CSX is a beast. i belive its for competitions. the W7 is a daily driver. personally id take the W7 over it but that can be argued over in 31 different flavors.
Silver Member
Username: Lexuscoop Post Number: 853 Registered: Dec-05
Posted on
Monday, February 20, 2006 - 19:11 GMT lol! so just kuz its new means that it should be better? or are they that expensice because they are new and haven't been mas produced
Silver Member
Username: Jakeyplaysbass St. Louis,
MO
Post Number: 585 Registered: Jul-05
Posted on
Monday, February 20, 2006 - 20:50 GMT the CSX is a straight SPL competition subwoofer. its not for everyday use and pretty much just for test tones, not even regular music. it can handle 7500-10000watts rms. treo is also coming out with a CTX SPL woofer than supposedly takes 20,000watts rms.
Silver Member
Username: Lexuscoop Post Number: 861 Registered: Dec-05
Posted on
Monday, February 20, 2006 - 21:07 GMT now why would you even get that... its just a wast LOL.
Silver Member
Username: Spyder Eglin AFB,
Florida
USA
Post Number: 292 Registered: Jun-05
Posted on
Tuesday, February 21, 2006 - 03:11 GMT if you want loud and clarity....then the W7 is for you....if you just want straight loud for competition then the CSX is for you.