|
PanFan Unregistered guest | Hey, does anybody like the looks of the new panasonic HUs better than the old 1's. Personally, I loved the looks of the old style |
|
Gold Member Username: IlluminatorPost Number: 1235 Registered: Apr-05 | How new are we talking? Maybe you could give us an example of a new unit and an older one... |
|
PanFan Unregistered guest | Alright, the way to tell is the model #. For example, this is a new one.CQ-C5401U http://img.shopping.com/cctool/PrdImg/images/pr/177X150/00/01/65/40/41/23412801. JPG This is the slightly older version CQ-C5410U http://www.carreview.com/Channels/CarReview/images/products/Product_298717.jpg The basic changes apply throughout the Panasonic models |
|
Gold Member Username: IlluminatorPost Number: 1244 Registered: Apr-05 | Ahh, yeah, the older models had a much nicer look. The silver and neon blue fit perfectly together. |
|
Silver Member Username: Iowahawks19Post Number: 345 Registered: Jun-05 | haha yea same, i love panasonic, ppl bash on it, but it's affordable/sleek design(on some)/tons of features(for the $) and sounds good as far as your Q, i also like the older version |
|
PanFan Unregistered guest | Another topic, Does anyone else get bored with almost all of Alpine's Hus looking the same? There seems to be a lack of orignality. |
|
Silver Member Username: Audioguy22Post Number: 101 Registered: Jul-05 | I like the older style as well. As for Alpine, they claim they save the user money by not having flashy displays. They also claim the R&D go's into the SQ. Funny how the Pioneer I replaced my Alpine with sounds better and has the OEL display. But I do like the Alpine display better because I can see it during day light hours. |