|
Silver Member Username: Iowahawks19Post Number: 295 Registered: Jun-05 | i was just wondering to compare to my subs so what would you saw was a good amount of Xmax for a sub? |
|
Gold Member Username: HdubbFarmington, Nm Usa Post Number: 1987 Registered: Nov-04 | id say average these days is about 24. 28+ is a good amount |
|
Silver Member Username: Iowahawks19Post Number: 297 Registered: Jun-05 | dang mines only 11.5, haha o well |
|
Silver Member Username: Mike_anthesCanton, SD USA Post Number: 182 Registered: Aug-04 | dude r u sure average is that...cuz i mean...that would mean like everybody that is average has a brahma...i bet it is lower...but maybe on this forum...i could be that...i mean think of all the people with type rs and cvrs...and walmart subs...not many people have xxxs and brahmas...and stuff...or is that bothways...that would make more sense |
|
Silver Member Username: Alias747MN Post Number: 491 Registered: Apr-05 | I would definately say that 24mm of xmax AVERAGE is a little high Hunter. I would put average of all subs around like 15-ish. Like mike was saying, 11.5, most lower end subs dont have that much. |
|
Silver Member Username: Dominirica012Charlotte, North Carolina US Post Number: 372 Registered: May-05 | xmax for 9500 is 25.5 and i would consider this sub higher than average |
|
Silver Member Username: Alias747MN Post Number: 494 Registered: Apr-05 | Well the 13w7 is rated for 32mm of xmax, that is high and it just looks awesome. But 32mm is WAY above average. Take a look: http://www.realmofexcursion.com/videos/JL/12w7.2.wmv This is actually a 12w7 which is 29mm. Tight! |
|
gonzo 1 Unregistered guest | does any 1 know where i can get boston acoustic pro 12.5 sub's at a good price? i'm installing them in my ski nautique. |
|
Silver Member Username: Audiobass10Cape Coral, FL United States Post Number: 179 Registered: Jul-05 | 20 mm of xmax is considered a high excursion sub in my boox. |
|
Gold Member Username: GlasswolfWisteria, Lane USA Post Number: 8215 Registered: Dec-03 | xmax isn't, by itself, going to tell you much. a high xmax doesn't mean a high SPL sub.. and a low xmax doesn't man the sub isn't loud. examples: the XXX has less xmax than the SX from RE, but the SX is louder. the Kicker L7 has a relatively small xmax, but it's a good SPL sub anyway. remember, if you want to look at excursion, look at not just Xmax, but Xsus, Xmag, and Xmech as well. Xmax is just linear travel.. you can have subs that can hit well beyond linear travel by playing beyond the magnetic gap.. while hard to control a sub at this stage, it does make for more SPL when done right. anyway point is, xmax alone is pretty maningless. |