Gold Member Username: HdubbFarmington, Nm Usa Post Number: 1774 Registered: Nov-04 | http://www.soundsolutionsaudio.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=2748 |
Gold Member Username: Jonathan_fGA USA Post Number: 4091 Registered: May-04 | Only downsides to that is you're using more coil, thus more inductance and also more mass, which makes the sub less efficient and requires more power. Other than that it's a good design and more linear than XBL^2. If they don't get too happy with it (going to the extremes of excursion and such) then it'll be fantastic. |
Gold Member Username: Jonathan_fGA USA Post Number: 4092 Registered: May-04 | I'm saying that from an overall driver standpoint, BTW. Subwoofers it won't hurt much to have a bigger inductance, mids and tweets it doesn't leave as much hope, though. |
Gold Member Username: HdubbFarmington, Nm Usa Post Number: 1791 Registered: Nov-04 | depends on what xbl^2 motor.....parthenon? and i actually read on sounddomain.com that adire patented a motor very similar to the lmt motor, they called it the v12 something another 9er, they said they did it in the process of developing the xbl^2 motor. |