I'm about to get some subs and was originally going to get 2 12" Type R's. But I heard alot of people talking about the Shivas being alot better than anything else in the price range. The Type R's are about $110 a piece and the Shivas are about $120. Does everyone agree that I should go with the Shiva's instead?
Help
Unregistered guest
Posted on
Shivas have good SQ but dont get loud. The technology they use is inefficient. Id go with the Type-Rs myself.
help wtf are u talking about. you said the w0 would be better than the shiva cuz it's more expensive. you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.
i just got my 2 shivas installed like 4 days ago, and they would definately sound better than the type r's and get louder too. go with the shiva's... i was considering the same thing 2 months ago, i'm glad i went with the shiva's.
Help
Unregistered guest
Posted on
I didnt say that, first of all. Plus, how can you tell me I dont know what Im talking about. I cant even understand what youre typing. Next time youre going to try to discredit my opinion, do it with some class. Ive been around car audio for almost a decade now. Although Im not as experienced as GlassWolf or Jonathan. I know a thing or two.
Ive heard both the shiva and type-r's back to back. I prefer the Type-R's Shivas werent designed to get loud. ask Dan Wiggins, he'll tell you that. Im sick of all these people with Adire hard-ons XBL^2 can hold a lot of power, yes but theyre innefficient. If you want to put a crap-ton of power in them theyll sound great. personally, Id rather not.
i have also heard them both. shivas get louder than type-r's no question about it! theyre definately NOT inefficient either... they sound crisper and get a hell of a lot louder than type-r's. you can have an opinion, but you may want to re-evaluate it.
i don't have an "adire hard on" i just know what loud is.