Gold Member Username: SomedonniedudeIllinois Braaap MX Post Number: 2235 Registered: May-07 | So I was at a local shop not too long back and was talking with a few guys about efficiency and whatnot and I brought up Mmats. A guy at the shop claimed that the US amps are more efficient that the Mmats. Any truth to this? I'm referring to the MD line and the mmats class D's. I remember hearing awhile back that newer US amps don't do rated and maybe that's why the guy thinks they are more efficient? But then again they are an RE/US amps dealer so I figured he might just be talking them up, but he never did say anything bad about the mmats amps. |
Gold Member Username: Nd4spd18Philadelphia, PA Post Number: 9372 Registered: Jul-06 | He is repping what he sells just like every shop does. US amps is not what they used to be, and mmats efficiencey is extremely hard to beat. |
Gold Member Username: SomedonniedudeIllinois Braaap MX Post Number: 2239 Registered: May-07 | That's what I was thinking. Do the current MD series do rated power? I remember hearing awhile back they they started using cheaper components on their amps. Like all at once there current line of amps just started sucking and it was hit and miss with them. Any truth? |
Silver Member Username: MmaudioconceptsPost Number: 600 Registered: Jan-07 | I sell Us amps and IMO the efficiancy is close to the same as far as the MD series. Some of the other series of Us amps are as high as 90% efficient and those are hard to beat. |
Silver Member Username: TylerslivaSt.Ignace, Mi U.S. Post Number: 126 Registered: Oct-08 | lol a us amps seller saying that they are efficient lol |
Gold Member Username: Snowball123West Allis, WI Post Number: 1887 Registered: Oct-07 | yeah? |
Gold Member Username: Nd4spd18Philadelphia, PA Post Number: 9383 Registered: Jul-06 | Cheaper components and construction.... like most others they aren't made in the USA anymore. |
Gold Member Username: Van_manBoston South, MA Post Number: 4517 Registered: Mar-06 | i need to get my MMAts D200 fixed It used to be efficient. Now its not. |
Platinum Member Username: Basshead86FTW Post Number: 10207 Registered: Aug-05 | hey dudes....check this out!!! https://www.ecoustics.com/electronics/forum/car-audio/40.html |
Platinum Member Username: Basshead86FTW Post Number: 10208 Registered: Aug-05 | |
Gold Member Username: Van_manBoston South, MA Post Number: 4519 Registered: Mar-06 | ? |
Gold Member Username: Van_manBoston South, MA Post Number: 4520 Registered: Mar-06 | No, Wait, take the red pill. |
Platinum Member Username: Basshead86FTW Post Number: 10210 Registered: Aug-05 | if i have to spell it out...then the joke has gone bad...so i'll wait and see if someone catches it |
Gold Member Username: SomedonniedudeIllinois Braaap MX Post Number: 2244 Registered: May-07 | I went back to the shop today and mentioned something about amp efficiency and THD again, regarding 2 channel amps this time. The same guy said he liked US amps more than his old mmats and harrison amps lol. Said the efficieny was beter and the sound was way cleaner, and to prove this said cuz US rates there amps at a .006% THD. Then he said his mmats amp sounded muddy on bass, but about 15min later said that 10% thd wasn't audible in a subwoofer. I lol'd all the way home about this adventure. |
Gold Member Username: Van_manBoston South, MA Post Number: 4524 Registered: Mar-06 | us amps does rate at .006 where as MMats has a .002, but mostly .3,.5,.6. And yes, it is not a big deal to have a sub play at 10%. So he is not as dumb as you think. |
Gold Member Username: SomedonniedudeIllinois Braaap MX Post Number: 2245 Registered: May-07 | He knows alot, but when talking to him it seems so fishy because he recommends us amps over anything. But I thought 10% was audible? And I even asked him if it was audible if you were to put your head right next to the sub and he said no. Is he right? Muddy are you hinting that this thread should be in the amplifier section? |