Bronze Member Username: LilpimpdPost Number: 40 Registered: Jul-06 | are alpine type x's be consider sql or spl subs? and are they good? |
Platinum Member Username: BestmankindWww.15inchwangers.comFI Audio BTL Post Number: 10492 Registered: Oct-05 | sq. i wouldn't get those. they are power hungry and don't get that loud compared to alot of other subs. |
Silver Member Username: SpkrmanChi town, IL U S A Post Number: 181 Registered: Mar-06 | They are SQ woofers, and sound very very good Alot of mainstream haters on these boards, the X's are solid woofers. They are particularly strong on the low bass, awesome extension. For the cost they are a pretty good value. Once woofer you may want to check out, however, is the www.tcsounds.com tc-9, tonally one of the best woofs ive ever heard, but lacks the extension of the X. *do not* run the tc-9 sealed. |
Platinum Member Username: BestmankindWww.15inchwangers.comFI Audio BTL Post Number: 10494 Registered: Oct-05 | i just don't like them cause i used to own a pair. it does have nice sq but the output was just not enough. i don't hate on a brand unless i have heard it or have owned it before. |
Silver Member Username: SpkrmanChi town, IL U S A Post Number: 186 Registered: Mar-06 | a pair of type X 10's or 12's can potentially have quite a bit of output, thats up to the box They do need 1000-1500 each, though, but fed the proper power they are solid woofers. |
Platinum Member Username: BestmankindWww.15inchwangers.comFI Audio BTL Post Number: 10495 Registered: Oct-05 | you are right about the right box. but me and many others don't have your skills mark. so i am basing my opinion on a basic ported box built to alpine specs. i also had them in sealed. i gotta admit though, it did hit down low well and also the upper bass was nice too. |
Silver Member Username: Nd4spd18Post Number: 433 Registered: Jul-06 | I'd listen to Mark. I don't think anybody else or here or any forum for that matter knows more about alpine woofers. |